Have you recently visited Upton House in
Oxfordshire? This year they have completely transformed the house to Banking
for Victory. In 1939 the Bearsteds who owned Upton House moved out and their
family-owned bank moved in. They needed to protect their staff and assets from
the London air raids so moved Samuel & Co. lock, stock and barrel for the
duration of the Second World War.
In the exhibition you can see how the bank staff lived and
worked in the 1940s. The long gallery has been turned into a typing pool and the
bedrooms have been set up for the bank staff that slept 2-4 to a room.
This is one example of the extremes contingency planning can
take. How do you cope during war where your head office is in danger of
bombing?
Now there are more threats than just bombing and important
work must go on. We have helped a bank to set up their alternative base of operations.
This ensured that in the event of any calamity they could operative effectively.
Their alternative fully operational base was a replica of the original, so that
their workers could seamlessly move from one location to the other. There was a
cost associated with this contingency plan including that the alternative base
needed staff to maintain the premises. So we set up the technicians shift
pattern to ensure that the Bank could always carry on operations regardless.
This sort of contingency planning is not new. The contingency
planning process can be broken down into three simple questions:
• What is going to happen?
• What are we going to do about it?
• What can we do ahead of time to get prepared?
Everyday Contingency Planning
We also help companies with the less glamorous and extreme contingency planning. Everyday most companies will face; absence, sickness, holiday leave and tardiness. We help companies ensure that these everyday events do not affect their operation.
Recently the crash that occurred on the M9 on 5th
July which resulted in two deaths went unattended for three days even through a
call was taken by the 101 service. Part of the problem appears to be that the
call centre was experiencing an over 10% absence rate. An ex-employee described
the situation as: "a firefighting exercise and you were doing, say, 10
tasks probably half as well as you could actually manage, because you were
trying to get so much done."
Very often staff, where there is no formal cover arrangement,
feel like they are ‘firefighting’. To some it is exciting, every day is
different. But for the majority it is stress that is unnecessary. So let’s go
back to the three questions of contingency planning.
What will happen is absence. We cannot avoid absences. We
can go further and assess how often and in what quantity absences will occur.
What are we going to do about it is a harder question to
answer. It depends on budget, skill mix, staffing numbers and workload. In
general we advocate covering for the absence. If you maintain a consistent
level of service you will have a better operation. Even if that level of
service is lower than you would like, a consistent service is better in the
long run. That way every day is the same and you can focus on improvement rather
than spending your time ‘firefighting’.
No comments:
Post a Comment